Paul and James have a great controversy
in their excerpts on the concept of righteousness through belief and faith in
God and that of faith and works in God.
Although it is not supposed to be a
controversy, many think so. Paul emphasized that salvation and oneness with God
is by faith only in Christ Jesus whilst James seems to stress the point that
faith without works is dead. According to James, faith and works move together,
but Paul seems to say that faith alone is okay. This excerpt reveals the true
idea underlying their teachings.
To fully comprehend and understand
these excerpts, we need to consider the people that the individual writers were
writing to. We also need to consider the issue that they were addressing with
their letters, the mindset of the people towards the issues and not all, the
situations under which the letters were written. I strongly believe that if
James were to write to those Paul wrote to, he would have written the very same
words as Paul and vice-versa.
Let us take a look at the scriptures
that tend to bring out this controversy so that we can critically look into it.
Paul writes to the Romans in
Romans 4:2 saying “For if Abraham were
justified by works, he has something to glory; but not before God.
3 For what says the scripture? Abraham
believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
4
Now to him that works is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.
5
But to him that works not, but believeth on him that justifies the ungodly, his
faith is counted for righteousness.
6
Even as David also describes the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputes
righteousness without works,
7 Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose
sins are covered.
8
Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not
impute sin.
9 Comes this blessedness then upon the
circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also?
for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness.
10
How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision?
Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision.
11
And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the
faith which he
had yet being
uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though
they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them
also:
12
And the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only,
but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised”.
We can deduce from the scripture above
that Paul was writing to Romans who were Gentiles by nature and in other words
“those of the uncircumcision”. There were Jews living in Rome in those days,
however, but Paul was an apostle to the gentiles and so wrote according to the
grace of God that God He gives him towards the gentiles.
Paul stresses the concept of righteousness
without works which he reveals Abraham had. Abraham could have got something to
boast of if it were to be by works, but that boasting will definitely not be in
the presence of God because all our righteousness is but a filthy rag.
Nevertheless, Abraham had it by faith alone.
Paul again raised a vital point. He
stresses the issue of when the righteousness of God was imputed unto him. Was
it imputed while he was circumcised or uncircumcised? It was definitely when he
was uncircumcised for circumcision came only as a seal of the righteousness
that Abraham had whilst he was then uncircumcised. This also suggests that
circumcision in itself is not righteousness, but just a seal of the
righteousness that they had with God.
This makes things clearer. Looking at
this, we can see the mindset of the people that Paul was writing to. They might
actually have the mindset that after their belief in Jesus, they need to be
circumcised in order to attain righteousness with God. They thought
circumcision is the guarantee to righteousness but Paul was making it clear to
them that circumcision was only a seal, and not the righteousness itself.
What is then referred to as “works”
over here is the issue of circumcision. Paul is stressing the point that if
Abraham was justified by the work of circumcision, he could have something to
boast of, but that boasting will never be before God.
Things get much clearer when you take a
look at the twelfth verse that reveals that those of faith must also walk in the steps of that faith of our
father Abraham. This
implies that the faith of Abraham requires some steps; things that need to be
done and not just sitting idle saying “I have got the faith of Abraham”. What
if it is these steps; these things that need to be done that is those things
that James is referring to as the works. Well, let us see. Let us think about this because Paul made the
distinction clearly that the work he was referring to is the work of
circumcision that does not qualify one to be righteous. He, however, did not
leave out the steps of faith that need to be taken, just as Abraham did. We
can, therefore, conclude in a way that Paul is trying to say that Abraham got
his righteousness by faith and without the works (of circumcision); however,
his faith caused him to take some steps which are definitely not the work of
circumcision.
This issue was also a major concern in
the church of Galatia and Paul again addresses it stating in Galatians 3:1 “O foolish Galatians, who has
bewitched you that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ
hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you?
2
This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law,
or by the hearing of faith?
3
Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the
flesh?
4
Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain.
5 He
therefore that ministers to you the Spirit, and works miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by
the hearing of faith?
6 Even
as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.
7
Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of
Abraham.
8
And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith,
preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In
thee shall all nations be blessed.
9
So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.
10 For
as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written,
Cursed is every one that continues not in
all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
11
But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live
by faith”.
It is clear over here that Paul
directly calls it “the works of the law” and not just works. These show that
the works of the law such as circumcision and the obedience of the Sabbath
etcetera do not justify one before God, but faith only. That is why it is
stated that the just shall live by faith, but mind you; faith also requires
some steps in which we need to move in. Paul decided not to call these steps
“works”, but let us see if these steps are the ones that James called “works”
or was he also referring to the “works of the law” just as Paul did. This will
bring out the confusion in these two scriptures making us see whether there was
actually a controversy or not.
James 2:14 “What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man
says he has faith, and have not works? can faith save him?
15 If
a brother or sister be naked and destitute of daily food,
16 And
one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give
them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?
17 Even
so, faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.
18 Yea,
a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: show me thy faith without thy
works, and I will show thee my faith by my works.
19 Thou
believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and
tremble.
20 But
wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
21
Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his
son upon the altar?
22
Sees thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made
perfect?
23
And the scripture was fulfilled which says, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed
unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
24
Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
25
Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had
received the messengers and had sent them out
another way?
26
For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead
also”.
I believe you have already seen the
difference if you should take a critical look at this. The things that James
refers to as works are the act of helping one another in need. The church that
James was actually writing to could have lacked the sense of care that is
needed in the body of Christ. Let us take out the work that the church lacks
that prompts James to write this.
“15 If a brother or sister be naked
and destitute of daily food,
16 And
one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give
them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?”
We see earlier on that Paul says that
our faith requires some steps in which we need to walk in. James now clearly
points out those steps that Abraham walked in as the “works of Abraham”. Paul
calls them “the steps of the faith of Abraham” whilst James call it “the works
of Abraham”. It is also evident that James letter has nothing to do with
circumcision and other works of the law. It is only centered on love for one
another which is the new commandment of the church.
According to James, your faith is made
perfect when you perform or take action on what your faith requires you to do.
Paul was not in objection to that because he admonishes that we need to “walk
in that faith of our father Abraham”.
In this sense, if you have faith in God
for salvation, believe and confess him according to Romans 10:9-10.
If you have faith in a business idea,
start it.
If you have faith that your prayer can
heal the sick, pray for the sick etcetera.
Brethren, I believe this has help
cleared up the confusion on these two scriptures. God is not the author of confusion.
He would not say one thing to one person, and another to another.
Leave a comment, share your views and
alert a friend on this if you care.
Remain blessed.
No comments:
Post a Comment